Russia emphatically disagrees with the conclusions contained in the report of the Dutch Safety Board following a probe into the MH17 flight disaster, the deputy chief of Russia’s aviation agency Rosaviatsiya, Oleg Storchevoy has told the media.
"We’ve studied the document and I can say with responsibility that the Russian commission categorically disagrees with the report’s conclusions. These are fundamentally wrong and contradiction to logic is out of proportion," he said.
"It seems the commission was picking evidence. The report does not have enough facts confirming the trustworthiness of the investigation," Storchevoy said.
"The shape and chemical composition of the H-shaped strike elements have nothing to do with those presented in the commission’s report. It is essential to have officially published information confirming these elements were identified," he said.
Russia has no absolute proof of the fact that the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 plane was downed over Ukraine by a Buk antiaircraft system missile, Storchevoy noted.
The Russian side has invited members of the international commission on the investigation of the MH17 crash to come to Russia and familiarize themselves with the parameters of the Buk missile system but received no reply, he said.
"Our invitations to come to Russia and familiarize themselves with the original data and the parameters of Buk have remained unanswered," Storchevoy added.
On Tuesday, the Dutch Safety Board published the results of its probe into the MH17 crash in eastern Ukraine in mid-July 2014 and its results contradict the findings announced by the Russian antiaircraft missile system manufacturer Almaz-Antey.
According to the report the airliner was hit by a missile with the 9H314M warhead. Meanwhile, Almaz-Antey proved earlier on Tuesday that the Boeing was shot down by an older missile modification with different striking elements.
Almaz-Antey also confirmed the version that the fatal missile had been launched from the Zaroshchenskoye community controlled by the Ukrainian military and rejected the international commission’s version of the missile’s launch from Snezhnoye, a town that had been under militia’s control at that time.
http://tass.ru/en/politics/828844
14/10/15
--
-
Related:
"We’ve studied the document and I can say with responsibility that the Russian commission categorically disagrees with the report’s conclusions. These are fundamentally wrong and contradiction to logic is out of proportion," he said.
"It seems the commission was picking evidence. The report does not have enough facts confirming the trustworthiness of the investigation," Storchevoy said.
- Dutch probe found no characteristic strike elements in Boeing’s debris
"The shape and chemical composition of the H-shaped strike elements have nothing to do with those presented in the commission’s report. It is essential to have officially published information confirming these elements were identified," he said.
- Russia invites international commission members to get acquainted with Buk parameters
Russia has no absolute proof of the fact that the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 plane was downed over Ukraine by a Buk antiaircraft system missile, Storchevoy noted.
The Russian side has invited members of the international commission on the investigation of the MH17 crash to come to Russia and familiarize themselves with the parameters of the Buk missile system but received no reply, he said.
"Our invitations to come to Russia and familiarize themselves with the original data and the parameters of Buk have remained unanswered," Storchevoy added.
- Russian missile manufacturer MH17 crash report
On Tuesday, the Dutch Safety Board published the results of its probe into the MH17 crash in eastern Ukraine in mid-July 2014 and its results contradict the findings announced by the Russian antiaircraft missile system manufacturer Almaz-Antey.
According to the report the airliner was hit by a missile with the 9H314M warhead. Meanwhile, Almaz-Antey proved earlier on Tuesday that the Boeing was shot down by an older missile modification with different striking elements.
Almaz-Antey also confirmed the version that the fatal missile had been launched from the Zaroshchenskoye community controlled by the Ukrainian military and rejected the international commission’s version of the missile’s launch from Snezhnoye, a town that had been under militia’s control at that time.
http://tass.ru/en/politics/828844
14/10/15
--
-
Related:
Airspace should have been closed before MH17 disaster
- Ukraine says it adhered to ICAO recommendations at time of MH17 crash ...
--
Ukraine explains not closing airspace before MH17 downed
Holanda llama a Rusia a respetar el informe sobre MH17
Malaysia PM vows to bring MH17 shooters to justice
Países Bajos sobre el MH17: "¿Por qué se permitió volar al avión en una zona de guerra?"
La Russie compte relancer l'enquête sur le crash du Boeing malaisien survenu dans l'est de l'Ukraine en juillet 2014, a annoncé l'agence fédérale russe de l'aviation (Rosaviatsia)...
ReplyDelete"La Fédération de Russie utilisera le droit d'initier la reprise de l'enquête sur la catastrophe, prévu par la norme 5.13 de la treizième annexe de la Convention relative à l'aviation internationale civile", a annoncé le vice-directeur de Rosaviatsia Oleg Stortchevoï.........http://sptnkne.ws/UcF